HomeAIThis Leading Web3 Bug Bounty Platform Cracks Down On ChatGPT: Citing Invalidity

This Leading Web3 Bug Bounty Platform Cracks Down On ChatGPT: Citing Invalidity

Source: news.google.com

OpenAI introduced ChatGPT, a long-form question answering AI that answers complex queries conversationally. It is innovative technology as it has been taught to understand what people mean when they ask questions.

Many users are in awe of its ability to provide human-quality responses, giving rise to the idea that it could soon have the ability to revolutionize the way people interact with computers and alter the way information is retrieved. .

However, this technology has been causing problems in many different aspects. This is why.

Immunefi has banned 15 bug reports generated by ChatGPT

Immunefi is a bug bounty platform that focuses on web3 and smart contract security, with the goal of making web3 safe for everyone. Blockchain and smart contract projects can use Immunefi’s hosting, consulting, and bounty program management services. It has grown to become the leading bug bounty platform for web3.

In a recent tweet from Immunefi, he mentioned that he has so far banned 15 people for sending ChatGPT reports.

Furthermore, Immunefi engineers emphasized that there are differences between ChatGPT and services like GitHub Copilot. With the former, you’re in control of the process, and Copilot’s job is to make contextually relevant suggestions that you can accept or reject as you write your program. With the latter, you’re using a single flag to produce what initially appears to be a well-written bug report, but is ultimately unintelligible.

Immunefi went a step further, asking ChatGPT why the program shouldn’t be used for generating bug reports, receiving a “satisfactory response” and sharing the same on Twitter.

Immunefi stated that it will continue to watch the reports generated by ChatGPT as they become more sophisticated.

Will they lift the ban?

In the future, Immunefi might consider lifting the ban on submitting AI-generated bug reports. “We will be keeping an eye on the development of AI tools, and will consider lifting the ban on their use if they are ever capable of generating actual bug reports,” they recently said. But for now, the ban is in effect.

To conclude, the use of AI for this type of reporting has its pros and cons. Some of the advantages include efficiency, scalability, and consistency. But at the same time with cons like the lack of context and the inability to understand or comprehend.

Read More at news.google.com

RELATED ARTICLES

New updates